Affordable Health Care Reform is Upheld By SCOTUS

This is a very important upholding of the law, for President Obama. It verifies Obama's understanding of Constitutional Law, for one thing. It also lends credence to the fact that he listened to the American people, and while not getting exactly what most of us asked for, Universal Health Care, we got some assurances that we won't lose our houses if we get some debilitating disease or illness, nor can we be denied health care, if we have an existing disease or illness. Our seniors benefitted from the health care reform act, as well as our young adults who may not be full time college students but also don't have insurance through their companies. Frankly, I see those days coming to an end, and I think that is a good thing, in the long run. Employers may sweeten the pot when they hire, by offering better than average health insurance, but the health care burden that has been placed on them for the past 10-15 years has really drained their general funds, and so this reform looks promising for them as well.

The one piece of this legislation, in fact the ONLY piece of this legislation, that I didn't agree with was the mandated health insurance piece which says everyone MUST have insurance. Don't get me wrong, I think everyone MUST have insurance, but this mandate seemed to be driven by the health insurance companies, at least to me. But today, when reading the briefs from the SCOTUS, I learned something new. The mandate requirement says you must have insurance or you must pay 1% of your income (whether this is a "tax" or not is part of the debate) toward government insurance, probably Medicare, right? This goes into effect in 2014.

So I started thinking about that. Even though my husband's company "pays for" our insurance, it actually comes out of our premiums. So each month, we are paying $1200 health care premiums. Let's do the math. 1200 x 12 months = $14,400. Hmmm, that would mean we would have to earn $144,000 each year in income to fuss about this mandate. But we don't make that much, and so I am left to believe we would be BETTER OFF buying into the government insurance. After all, we don't have any glitzy insurance plans. Those days have been long gone. And that would mean that my husband's raises would no longer have to go toward our insurance, which means more money in our pockets.

Now I can better understand why the insurance companies were so busy fighting this. And now I feel like I actually like ALL components of the reform.

Today was a good day for Americans. Mitt Romney wants to drop the whole thing on his first day in office. He wants to drop the plan that was so similar to HIS plan in Massachusetts. Hmmm, interesting little flip flopper, isn't he?

So how do you feel about health care reform being upheld by the SCOTUS?

To leave a comment, please sign in with
or

Comments (20)

  1. gbakere

    Change doesn’t happen over night. I think “Obamacare” is just one step in the right direction which would be a nationalized healthcare system.

    June 28, 2012
    1. jillsthoughts

      I agree. And I hate the name, “Obamacare.” Did the republicans in Massachusetts call Romney’s plan “Romneycare?” It has a grown up name. I wish they would use it.

      June 29, 2012
      1. gbakere

        I actually like the term Obamacare. His name is attached to it as the one responsible for it. It will not likely be repealed so he will get full credit for it as he should. 100 years from now, everyone will still know who gave us our first “relatively complete” healthcare system.

        July 04, 2012
        1. jillsthoughts

          Okay, I get your explanation. I just hate how the right has sullied it.

          July 04, 2012
          1. gbakere

            I can’t argue that but let’s wear it with pride as a badge of honor. We can all say, I love MY Obamacare! It belongs to all of us who signed petitions and supported it in various ways. Actually, it belongs to all of us – period.

            July 04, 2012
            1. jillsthoughts

              Yep.

              July 04, 2012
  2. wirelessguru1

    The NWO and the ruling elites win and the servants and slaves lose yet again!!!

    Essentially, “individual mandate” is a slavery TAX to live in America!!!

    June 28, 2012
    1. jillsthoughts

      Well, it isn’t specifically called a tax, but I would rather pay 1% in taxes toward my family’s healthcare, if I don’t have employer-based healthcare coverage, than have everyone else pay for my surgery if I am hospitalized with no insurance. This is more fair.

      June 29, 2012
      1. wirelessguru1

        Because you’re a good “servant”!

        The ruling elites love good servants like you…

        June 29, 2012
  3. 29A

    I was suprised, and that the individual mandate passed not under the ‘commerce clause’, but as a tax, when Obama had assured us it wasn’t. As an aside, I was looking for where all this post might show, specifically Topics/Politics, but it didn’t show there…not sure if tagging it politics would fix that.

    June 28, 2012
    1. jillsthoughts

      My understanding is that it wasn’t entirely clear yet whether it was a “tax” or not.

      Thanks for the info on tagging. I will tag it USA Politics so people know it is there.

      June 29, 2012
      1. 29A

        Here’s an article calling the mandate a tax. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/supreme-court-upholds-obamacare-individual-mandate-tax/story?id=16669186 Actually, from what I’ve read tags are now topics. Where I was tryiing to get your blog to show up was: http://thoughts.com/topics/politics , with the tag ‘USA politics’, it still doesn’t show, it may work with just ‘politics’.

        June 29, 2012
        1. jillsthoughts

          My understanding was that the administration’s lawyers were seeking to let it pass under the commerce clause, but they left the door open that it be considered a tax. I still think it is a better deal than most of us are paying for health care.

          I will try the politics tag and see what happens…

          June 29, 2012
          1. 29A

            Like you said, the administration’s oral arguments to SCOTUS were that it was allowable under the commerce clause but it is my understanding that it was SCOTUS which determined that it was a tax. It may take a bit to sort everything out. Your post now shows up under topics/politics.

            June 29, 2012
            1. jillsthoughts

              Thanks for the “fix!”

              June 29, 2012
  4. Munkyman

    This is the same Supreme Court that gave us Citizen’s United, I don’t have much faith in their ethical bearing.
    As the caregiver for my 85 year old grandmother & a person who’s been licensed to sell health insurance I’d like you to explain what this has, in your opinion, done for seniors. Granny’s “premium” for her Medicare went up about 10% right off the bat taking almost all of the COLA she got after they unfroze Social Security COLA so they could give themselves raises again. Her doctor charges her for individual questions during a checkup in order to bill her what he “needs.” Not only this but, the fact is the system encourages this type of itemized billing instead of penalizing it.

    This supposed overhaul of the system falls far short of any meaningful reform in my opinion & that’s why I opposed it it’s wasted money until we’re ready to do it right & really get into gutting the bureaucracy & removing as much of the profit motives in healthcare as is plausible.

    June 29, 2012
    1. jillsthoughts

      Read here to find out how this will help you 85 year old grandmother. BTW, my mother is 84 and my stepfather is 86, my father-in-law is 89. Believe me, I have a vested interest in their health care. http://usapolitics.thoughts.com/posts/explain-the-health-care-act-like-i-am-five

      June 29, 2012
    2. jillsthoughts

      MM: "Her doctor charges her for individual questions during a checkup in order to bill her what he “needs.” Not only this but, the fact is the system encourages this type of itemized billing instead of penalizing it." There was some fraud involved before, and that is why they want itemized accountability for services. I have no way to determine whether your doctor itemized for each question he asked. That seems ridiculous. “really get into gutting the bureaucracy & removing as much of the profit motives in healthcare as is plausible.” I agree with you here. This law has that component in place.

      June 29, 2012
  5. gbakere

    Jill,
    I saw Obama in a speech a couple of days ago refer to the Affordable Care Act as Obamacare. He did it in kind of a joking manner but seemed proud of the fact that it has been name for the one who came up with it. He gets the credit – which he should. I like the term – probably because I like him.

    July 19, 2012
    1. jillsthoughts

      I have been using the term since this chat earlier, G. I agree, let the man carry the name. It was hard work, and he deserves it.

      July 23, 2012